Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:21:04 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Fwd: Bug#573205: reportbug: Incorrect EMAIL and NAME in
sent bug reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #573205,
regarding reportbug: Incorrect EMAIL and NAME in sent bug reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
573205: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573205
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.10.2
Severity: normal
While composing the message, the reportbug(1) responds, after sending
the report, with a message:
Bug report submitted to: "Debian Bug Tracking System"
<[email protected]>
Copies sent to:
Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Jari Aalto <[email protected]>
But looking at the bug reports in the BTS, this is not the NAME or
EMAIL that was used:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573197
I'm not sure where reportbug(1) takes the values for the "From:"
field. In BTS it reads:
From: "jari" <[email protected]>
Environment variables set:
$ env | egrep -i '^(email|name|deb)'
NAME=Jari Aalto
DEBFULLNAME=Jari Aalto
[email protected]
Content of ~/.reportbugrc:
# ~/.reportbugrc
mode standard
email [email protected]
realname "Jari Aalto"
# End of file
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="env LC_ALL=C emacs -q -nw -no-site-file "
VISUAL="env LC_ALL=C emacs -q -nw -no-site-file "
EMAIL="[email protected]"
DEBFULLNAME="Jari Aalto"
NAME="Jari Aalto"
** /home/jaalto/.reportbugrc:
editor "emacs -nw -q -Q"
mode standard
email [email protected]
realname "Jari Aalto"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.7.25.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.5.4-9 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-reportbug 4.10.2 Python modules for interacting wit
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
ii debconf-utils 1.5.28 debconf utilities
ii debsums 2.0.48 tool for verification of installed
ii dlocate 1.02 fast alternative to dpkg -L and dp
ii emacs22-bin-common 22.3+1-1.2 The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.1+1-5 The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
ii file 5.04-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gnupg 1.4.10-2 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii python-gtk2 2.16.0-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
pn python-gtkspell <none> (no description available)
ii python-urwid 0.9.9.1-1 curses-based UI/widget library for
pn python-vte <none> (no description available)
ii ssmtp [mail-transport-agent] 2.64-3 extremely simple MTA to get mail o
ii xdg-utils 1.0.2-6.1 desktop integration utilities from
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 19:03, Jari Aalto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>> Received: from [192.168.1.7] (helo=jondo.cante.net) by picasso.cante.net
>>> with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id
>>> 1Np4Eh-0002zW-QZ; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:32:56 +0200
>>> Received: by jondo.cante.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue,
>>> 09 Mar 2010 20:32:55 +0200
>>> From: "jari" <[email protected]>
>>
> Ok, so what is the jondo.cante.net host?
It's passing message from one MTA to another MTaA
> reportbug doesn't connect to the MTA... I bet there's a line:
> Sending message via /usr/sbin/sendmail...
Ok, I See it at:
/usr/share/pyshared/reportbug/submit.py:347
> there is no secret handshake between reportbug and MTA, it uses
> sendmail. Given only you face this problem, I can conclude it's
> something on your configuration.
Nothing has chnages in my MTA configuration for years other than
upgrades. But I have changes the environment variables and
~/.reportbugrc files.
I ran few tests more and injected few 'print' calls to python-reporbug
library to see what were the exact command to test on command line. Ran
through MTA debug, but all looked good.
Tested by sending a new reportbug mail, and, the From address is
correct. Go figure.
Closing. Thanks for the insight.
Jari
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
