Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:48:48 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#607089: reportbug: reorder question fo tags by
offering "patch" selection first
has caused the Debian Bug report #607089,
regarding reportbug: reorder question fo tags by offering "patch" selection
first
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
607089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.12.6
Severity: wishlist
The defaul ttags asked listing is:
Do any of the following apply to this report?
1 d-i This bug is relevant to the development of debian-installer.
2 ipv6 This bug affects support for Internet Protocol version 6.
3 l10n This bug reports a localization/internationalization issue.
4 lfs This bug affects support for large files (over 2 gigabytes).
5 patch You are including a patch to fix this problem.
6 upstream This bug applies to the upstream part of the package.
7 none
Please reorder the listing by order of most used. It would be best if
"patch" were first:
1 patch You are including a patch to fix this problem.
2 upstream This bug applies to the upstream part of the package.
3 d-i This bug is relevant to the development of debian-installer.
4 ipv6 This bug affects support for Internet Protocol version 6.
5 l10n This bug reports a localization/internationalization issue.
6 lfs This bug affects support for large files (over 2 gigabytes).
7 none
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="env LC_ALL=C emacs -q -nw -no-site-file "
VISUAL="env LC_ALL=C emacs -q -nw -no-site-file "
EMAIL="[email protected]"
DEBFULLNAME="Jari Aalto"
NAME="Jari Aalto"
** /home/jaalto/.reportbugrc:
editor "emacs -nw -q -Q"
mode standard
email [email protected]
realname "Jari Aalto"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.8.10 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze1 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-reportbug 4.12.6 Python modules for interacting wit
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
ii debconf-utils 1.5.36 debconf utilities
ii debsums 2.0.48+nmu3 tool for verification of installed
ii dlocate 1.02 fast alternative to dpkg -L and dp
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.2+1-5.1 The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
ii exim4-daemon-heavy [ 4.72-2 Exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended
ii file 5.04-5 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii python-gtk2 2.17.0-4 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
pn python-gtkspell <none> (no description available)
ii python-urwid 0.9.9.1-1 curses-based UI/widget library for
pn python-vte <none> (no description available)
ii xdg-utils 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2 desktop integration utilities from
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 16:55, Jari Aalto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: reportbug
> Version: 4.12.6
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> The defaul ttags asked listing is:
>
> Do any of the following apply to this report?
>
> 1 d-i This bug is relevant to the development of debian-installer.
> 2 ipv6 This bug affects support for Internet Protocol version 6.
> 3 l10n This bug reports a localization/internationalization issue.
> 4 lfs This bug affects support for large files (over 2 gigabytes).
> 5 patch You are including a patch to fix this problem.
> 6 upstream This bug applies to the upstream part of the package.
> 7 none
yes, sorted + a "none of the above" choice.
> Please reorder the listing by order of most used.
and how did you evaluate they are the most used?
> It would be best if
> "patch" were first:
>
> 1 patch You are including a patch to fix this problem.
> 2 upstream This bug applies to the upstream part of the package.
> 3 d-i This bug is relevant to the development of debian-installer.
> 4 ipv6 This bug affects support for Internet Protocol version 6.
> 5 l10n This bug reports a localization/internationalization issue.
> 6 lfs This bug affects support for large files (over 2 gigabytes).
> 7 none
Mh, sorry you didn't convinced me it's enough to be different than any
other menu and don't sort the entries: closing.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
