On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 23:59, Éric Araujo <[email protected]> wrote: >> That should not be a big problem, even if I'd probably go with >> "Reportbug - <pkg>" or "Reportbug for <pkg>" or something like that. > > Heh, I suggested to put the app name last in an imitation of what good > websites do: first put the specific info (page title), then the generic > info (site name), so that a look at the tab bar/task bar does not yield > only a repetition of the generic info.
Oh look, even Iceweasel does as you said :P >> Anyhow, it's not clear to me how having the package name in the title >> would help you with the first part of the report > > Oh, I did not make that explicit at all. I open several instances of > Reportbug at the same time, and then I go back and stare at a blank > input field with just “Re: ” I don’t even remember what that window was for. Ah now I'm getting it. > (P.S. I noticed how to add the user tags, I’ll do that in the future.) That's cool, thanks! but just don't add any if you're in doubt, we'll sort it out later which one to use. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
