severity 666469 important thanks On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 02:49, Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > Package: reportbug > Version: 6.3.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > (well, not completely, but this is definitely a RC bug if you don't > want a mess in the bug reports)
I'm not convinced this is RC (on reportbug) because it's not effecting all the users: downgraded. > I wanted to report a bug against libcairo2, but I got: > > $ reportbug libcairo2 > [...] > Getting status for libcairo2... > Verifying package integrity... > There may be a problem with your installation of libcairo2; > the following problems were detected by debsums: > debsums: package libcairo2 is not installed this is debsums replying, so at least you should have filed the bug against that: reportbug here is just a interface to it. > Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? > > So, I suspected that I should have used the complete package name: > > $ reportbug libcairo2:amd64 > [...] > > then everything seemed to be OK, as usual. The bug report was sent: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468 > > However the bug was assigned to libcairo2:amd64, which doesn't > exist for the Debian BTS (unknown maintainer, unknown source). was it defined somewhere how bugs for m-a packages should be filed? Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
