On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Sandro Tosi wrote: > I don't think that a bug is the proper way to mention it but no problem :)
it is the easiest imho and I personally prefer it when any package related problems get reported to debian BTS so there is lower chance I would forget fixing it > > current tags post 6.0 are the "lightweight" ones (made by default with 'git > > tag' without any -m or -s) -- they have no meta information (author, date), > > and > > thus e.g. are not even used by git describe by default. > I'm using 'debcommit -r' to create the tags, so if you want that to > change, feel free to reopen and reassign the bug to that tool. ah, cool... btw -- it already seems to have --sign-tags option which would be even better (to verify/guarantee authenticity of GIT repository). But altogether fixing that tool would not fix already existing tags -- so you might like to take a manual action as well (i.e. retag them), so I will just keep this report not reassigned and will open a new one against debcommit. that was just a hint anyways -- if you don't care, why should I? (until I run into it again and out of my poor memory "hint" again ;) ) Cheers, -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
