Your message dated Sun, 10 May 2015 00:07:28 -0400
with message-id
<cab4xwxy275ebgz-tx6kuryoklvxbjnhdflv_vphlnvrtjwl...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#758309: reportbug: Properly distinguish between source
and binary packages in ftpmaster removal requests
has caused the Debian Bug report #758309,
regarding reportbug: Properly distinguish between source and binary packages in
ftpmaster removal requests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
758309: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.5.0+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I filed a ftp.debian.org removal request for the *binary* package
v4l-utils. But the source package does have the same name. So in my
request #756154 the ftpmaster tried to remove the source package with
that name.
I think it would be beneficial if the ftp.debian.org package removal
template would allow to distinguish between source and binary removals.
The wiki page at https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals also gives
no hint how to properly addess this problem.
Thanks,
Gregor
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
DEBEMAIL="Gregor Jasny <[email protected]>"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/gjasny/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "4.12.6"
mode advanced
ui text
no-cc
header "X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]"
smtphost reportbug.debian.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.0.6
ii python 2.7.8-1
ii python-reportbug 6.5.0+nmu1
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn claws-mail <none>
pn debconf-utils <none>
pn debsums <none>
ii dlocate 1.02+nmu3
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.4+1-4.1+b1
ii file 1:5.19-1
ii gnupg 1.4.18-2
ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 2.11.1-1
ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-3+b1
pn python-gtkspell <none>
pn python-urwid <none>
pn python-vte <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.1
Versions of packages python-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.0.6
ii python 2.7.8-1
ii python-debian 0.1.22
ii python-debianbts 1.12
ii python-support 1.0.15
python-reportbug suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Gregor Jasny <[email protected]> wrote:
> I filed a ftp.debian.org removal request for the *binary* package
> v4l-utils. But the source package does have the same name. So in my
> request #756154 the ftpmaster tried to remove the source package with
> that name.
That was a mis-interpretation on the ftp-master side; there's nothing
to fix here, as the format generated by reportbug is correct.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
