I didn't try reportbug's unit tests, but I tested with reportbug-ng and
reportbug by *using* them with the new version of python-debianbts
installed. So far I didn't find any breakages. In contrast some bugs
have been fixed like the problem with the WNPP packages.
I didn't change the API (method calls and return values are the same)
and python-debianbts's unittests run smoothly.
Keep my fingers crossed,
Am 17.09.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> did you test the package as described? do not delegate the testing to us alone
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Bastian Venthur <vent...@debian.org> wrote:
>> As discussed a few weeks ago preparing the upload of the new
>> python-debianbts to unstable.
>> Am 27.08.2015 um 09:59 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
>>> Dear reportbug developers,
>>> developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
>>> python-debianbts away from SOAPpy to simplesoap. This will allow us to
>>> transition python-debianbts to Python3 soon.
>>> As far as I can see, the patch looks good and all unitttests run
>>> smoothly, however since this is really a major change under the hood I'd
>>> like to have it even more tested and evaluated before uploading it to
>>> unstable and affecting thousands of users. So how would you as reportbug
>>> team like to test the new package? Would you rather have it in
>>> experimental or just as another branch in the github repository?
>> Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
>> Debian Developer venthur at debian org
>> Reportbug-maint mailing list
Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
Reportbug-maint mailing list