Do you propose that http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/LATEST/ be a
symlink to http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1?

Nightly builds would be stored in
http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/20030711/ . Also,
http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/SNAPSHOT would be a symlink to the
latest nightly build.

how would we handle jakarta commons?: =20
http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-commons-collections/2.1/commons-collect=
ion
s.jar

* Projects outside of ASF

How would we handle something like GEF or Scarab from Tigris (I'm making =
a
probably incorrect assumption that Scarab might eventually be a war =
file):

http://repo.apache.org/org-tigris-gef/0.8.0/gef.jar
http://repo.apache.org/org-tigris-scarab/0.12/scarab.war









--------
Tim O'Brien=20


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 10:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: URI syntax
>=20
>=20
> O'brien, Tim wrote:
>=20
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:00 PM
> >>The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
> >>
> >>/project/version/artifact
> >>
> >>such as
> >>http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
> >>   =20
> >>
> >
> >
> >Why not collapse version into the filename, and add a level for jars
> >
> I like
> foo/1.1/foo.jar
> foo/1.1/license.txt
> foo/1.1/foo-optional.jar
> foo/1.2/foo.jar
> foo/1.2/license.txt
>=20
> instead of
>=20
> foo/jars/foo-1.1.jar
> foo/jars/foo-optional-1.1.jar
> foo/jars/foo-1.2.jar
> foo/license/license-1.1.txt
> foo/license/license-1.2.txt
>=20
> It is realy the choice of  "kind of artifact together" vs=20
> "All artifacts=20
> for a version together"
>=20
> both work
>=20
> This is just the URI
> where a client stores things on the local file system is a=20
> different matter.
>=20
> >
> >http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/jars/ant-1.5.jar
> >
> >Not all projects distribute jars.  What about a project that=20
> produces a=20
> >war file, or an ear file?
> >
> >it would make it easier to store periodic builds such as
> >
> >http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/jars/ant-20030212-0730.jar
> >http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/jars/ant-20030212-0930.jar
> >http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/jars/ant-20030212-1030.jar
> > =20
> >
> I know the java guys like the paclkage name sytnax
> But I think it is may be better to use the cvs module name as the=20
> "project"=20
>=20
> Doesn't really matter as long as we agree.
>=20
> >Also, the "." in the directory might not be a great idea, why not use
> >dashes:
> >
> >How about http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/jars/ant-1.5.jar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--------
> >Tim O'Brien
> >
> >
> > =20
> >
> >>--=20
> >>Nick Chalko                                         Show me=20
> the code.
> >>                          Centipede
> >>  Ant + autodownloadable build plugins + needed jars autodownload.
> >>              http://krysalis.org/centipede
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   =20
> >>
> >
> > =20
> >
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Nick Chalko                                         Show me the code.
>                           Centipede
>   Ant + autodownloadable build plugins + needed jars autodownload.
>               http://krysalis.org/centipede
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
>=20
>=20


Reply via email to