On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:23, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:10, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > For <organization> I would suggest a <groupId> where most projects would
> > use their FQDN and split on the dot for directory structure. Also the
> > manditory use of a version in the artifact name as even in your example
> > below the LICENSE.txt could potentially change from one release to
> > another and you wouldn't want to copy one version over another by
> > mistake and distribute it. An Unlikely example yes, but possible if the
> > version is not in the artifact itself. I also think the type should be
> > required.
> > So my attempt for further refinement would be this:
> Sorry about that, not sure how the bottom end got lost there ... anyway
Was the bottom of this message eaten again? I've tried twice now but in
the response I get back from the list my little URL example isn't
present. Is it showing up in the messages you guys are getting?
Jason van Zyl
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
-- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society