On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:23, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:10, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > For <organization> I would suggest a <groupId> where most projects would > > use their FQDN and split on the dot for directory structure. Also the > > manditory use of a version in the artifact name as even in your example > > below the LICENSE.txt could potentially change from one release to > > another and you wouldn't want to copy one version over another by > > mistake and distribute it. An Unlikely example yes, but possible if the > > version is not in the artifact itself. I also think the type should be > > required. > > > > So my attempt for further refinement would be this: > > Sorry about that, not sure how the bottom end got lost there ... anyway
Was the bottom of this message eaten again? I've tried twice now but in the response I get back from the list my little URL example isn't present. Is it showing up in the messages you guys are getting? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
