On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:22, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Jason, > > I think that Tim's ideas were pretty well-thought out and reflect a workable > consensus. The changes you are making to his ideas, if I read the > correctly, are to mandate a couple of things that he did not rule out, but > permitted to remain optional. Having them as optional does not strike me as > a problem. > > Best practices can always suggest that optional elements be used, and we'll > discover in practice how broadly the rule(s) should apply. > > We should make sure that folks like William Rowe and others who have > commented on the repository structure lately take a look at, and provide > feedback on, Tim's layout.
If someone else wants to act as secretary that's cool but I wanted to try and collect the ideas expressed so far in a small document. I'm not a huge fan of the wiki. If someone else has started some coherent documentation I won't step on anyone's toes but I'll help codify any existing docs there are. > --- Noel -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society