Chris McDonough wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Chris McDonough wrote:
>>> Alan Milligan wrote:
>>>> I'm in the midst of rolling repoze out on our BastionLinux RPM's
>>>> (at https://linux.last-bastion.net/LBN/up2date/plope/6 (repoze.*
>>>> and zope.*) for *exactly* what files and versions are being shipped).
>>>> We're at zope-2.9.9, the latest release that runs up plone-2.5.x.
>>>> I've thus packaged up the required components on
>>>> However, the zope.interface-3.4.0 is from a later version of Z3
>>>> than ships with Z2 (I think this is still at 3.3) and when
>>>> zope.app.component from the Z2 tree is invoked through paster, it
>>>> dies horribly when it can't find zope.interface.adapter.Surrogate -
>>>> which appears to have vanished between releases. Downgrading to
>>>> zope.interface-3.3.0, as shipped with zope-2.9.9 fixes this
>>>> (insofar as zope2.wsgi now runs up from the command line).
>>> Eek. You're right. I mispackaged. The zope.interface version up
>>> there now is the 3.2 version that ships with Zope 2.9. We maintain
>>> multiple indexes, and we haven't yet automated a buildbot to test
>>> them so it's exceedingly difficult to make sure they all work at all
>>> times. Apologies.
>>>> Similarly, the ZODB3 version (3.7.2) is later than that shipped in
>>>> zope-2.9.9. I don't expect any issues with this (yet at least) as
>>>> I'm running vanilla zeo from zope-2.9.9
>>> That doesn't cause any problem in our testing.
>>>> Is this anomaly simply due to hoping that nobody will notice if the
>>>> Z2.10 tarballs are foisted on Z2.9 users - or indeed are these
>>>> genuinely required, and I'm about to enter module import hell?
>>> No, I think you should be good now with the new distribution.
>>> Thanks for the notification.
>>>> Note that the zope.proxy and zope.testing tarballs are similarly
>>>> incorrect, but they too appear benign.
>>> I also believe these are benign.
>>> I'm currently running an easy_install to make sure.
>> Well it *would* have worked if easy_install didn't go off to
>> download.zope.org to find the latest zope.interface package due to a
>> promiscuous distribution_links in the ZODB package. See also
>> .. Ugh. I'll need to re-roll that ZODB egg without the
>> dependency-links and put it up there. I'll post when that's done.
> OK, the answer was:
> - Reroll the ZODB3 tarball. A new tarball named
> http://dist.repoze.org/zope2/2.9/ZODB3-188.8.131.52agendaless.tar.gz exists
> in both of these indexes (and is preferred over the "old" ZODB3 egg by
> easy_install as a result of the .1agendaless):
Hmmm. The ZODB version in 2.9.9 is 3.6.2 - you're inflicting an
upgrade. I'm not au fait with the changelog between these two
versions. As long as you've assured that if someone were to have run up
repoze over a ZODB, and then at some later point, restarted Z2 over it,
that Z2 can still read it, then that's fine. We've all had experiences
in the past with nasty __setstate__ side effects ensuring downgrades are
no longer possible.
Repoze-dev mailing list