Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > That package is now done...
> > http://static.repoze.org/zcmldocs
> > and
> > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/repoze.zcml/0.1
> > I've adjusted the trunk of bfg and the trunk of chameleon.zpt to use ZCML
> > declaration implementations from this rather than using the "stock"
> > implementations from zope.component.
> Given that Plone also uses chameleon.zpt (via five.pt) this means that,
> if I understand correctly, Plone now gains this dependency, and part of
> the Plone stack uses what will seem to most people like an arbitrary,
> almost-identical-but-not-quite way of configuring components that's
> different to what the rest of the stack uses.
I'm not sure that is true: people can still use the standard zope zcml
directorives instead of the repoze.zcml alternatives and everything will
The only downside is that chameleon.zpt will pull in a few extra
packages, but you yourself have argued that that should not bother
Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Repoze-dev mailing list