Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Chris McDonough wrote:
>>> That package is now done...
>>> I've adjusted the trunk of bfg and the trunk of chameleon.zpt to use ZCML
>>> declaration implementations from this rather than using the "stock"
>>> implementations from zope.component.
>> Given that Plone also uses chameleon.zpt (via five.pt) this means that,
>> if I understand correctly, Plone now gains this dependency, and part of
>> the Plone stack uses what will seem to most people like an arbitrary,
>> almost-identical-but-not-quite way of configuring components that's
>> different to what the rest of the stack uses.
> I'm not sure that is true: people can still use the standard zope zcml
> directorives instead of the repoze.zcml alternatives and everything will
> work normally.
> The only downside is that chameleon.zpt will pull in a few extra
> packages, but you yourself have argued that that should not bother
Repoze-dev mailing list