-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2009/7/2 Tim Hoffman <t...@zute.net>:
>> I think you woul lose that capability with just name based registrations.
> Yes, but perhaps for the better; it was always problematic to use
> component adaptation to create specialized views based on the iro,
> because of the order of adaptation, e.g. with viewlets:
> context, request, view, manager
> You will easily run into situations where you need to do a lot of
> seeming superflouous component registrations because you've
> specialized on ``context``, say.
> I think there is a better scheme out there which does not rely in this
> way on multi-adaptation.
The fact that multi-adaptation can be hard doesn't mean it can't also be
useful: I don't see *any* way to achieve Tim's goals without something
like an IRO.
Note that I *never* use viewlets, either: I consider them fundamentally
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Repoze-dev mailing list