On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 01:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > Tim Hoffman wrote: > > Hi Chris > > > > You are correct, I just didn't want to see the "view" directive just > > disappear and be left with a "page" implementation ;-). > > I just baked all this behavior into the "view" directive on the trunk. There > are no backwards incompatibilities. >
sweeet! that's it, got nothing more here than cheerleading. =) iain _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
