On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 01:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Tim Hoffman wrote:
> > Hi Chris
> > 
> > You are correct, I just didn't want to see the "view" directive just
> > disappear and be left with a "page" implementation ;-).
> 
> I just baked all this behavior into the "view" directive on the trunk.  There 
> are no backwards incompatibilities.
> 

sweeet! 

that's it, got nothing more here than cheerleading. =)

iain


_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to