Thanks for the writeup! On 2/23/10 14:14 , Chris McDonough wrote: > Documentation > ------------- > > - People would like to see a tutorial which hand-held people through > the process of moving from a imperative configuration to a > declarative configuration, and perhaps vice versa.
Interesting - I would have expected the other direction to be more popular. Do you know why people seem to prefer declarative? > DVCS > ---- > > There was some general agitation to move from SVN to a DVCS. I think > there's general consensus that this is a good idea. My reservations > are these: > > - Any choice about which DVCS we make will be "wrong": it's still > unclear which DVCS systems will "win" and which ones will "lose". > If the DVCS we choose turns out to be the "wrong" one, we'll need to > switch VC systems again in a couple of years. > > - I don't know how we'd handle contributor agreements. > > Even with these outstanding concerns and questions, I think we should > probably indeed move to a DVCS sometime soon -- maybe within the next > six months or so. When we do, Agendaless will play the role of tyrant > and choose which DVCS that will be and how it gets set up, and how > contributor agreements are handled. There's no way I can stop you > from expressing an opinion about how this process should work and the > concrete choice of DVCS, but personally I'm unlikely to respond; > please don't be disappointed if there isn't a resulting negotiation. From a personal perspective I'm likely to only contribute in the form of emailing patches if you move away from svn. Luckily I only contribute small things, so feel free to ignore me. Wichert. _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repozefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev