On 3/4/10 2:08 PM, Malthe Borch wrote: > On 4 March 2010 22:02, Kevin Kalupson <b...@bugs.repoze.org> wrote: >> I wouldn't expect the the xml headers in a macro template to be applied to >> the >> page template being rendered. It makes no sense to me that an element not >> contained within a macro definition would be applied to the page calling the >> macro under any situation. > > I sort of agree, except how else would we provide this functionality? > Or is it actually the case that it doesn't make sense for a macro to > control these headers –– I suspect it is. > I think it's the case that it doesn't make sense for the macro to control these headers. I have never had the expectation that a tag or header outside of a macro definition would appear in the final rendered page.
> Plone's answer to this is to have its wrapper template manually write > out the XML declaration or maybe just the DOCTYPE. That seems kind of > crude as well. > > \malthe > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev -Kevin _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
