On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 01:24:47PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Should be worked around as of yesterday when this commit was deployed: > > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/-/commit/a741f156dff8dd2f2a0b6531756865c958ef7fd7 > It will take a while for things to get back to normal... but future > builds should start working...
I'm not sure this is working as it should, from #debian-reproducible just now: <h01ger> #debian-reproducible-changes shows lots of FTBFS again on tests.r-b.o/debian <h01ger> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/stats_meta_pkg_state_maint_pkg-r.png also also I'm busy right now with running https://hamburg2026.mini.debconf.org/ so I'm unable to investigate properly, but #debian-reproducible-changes still (or again?) shows way too many packages becoming FTBFS *right now*... if someone could take another look that would be very much appreciated. > There has been a lot of focus and excitement on the "new" and important > reproduce.debian.net, which actually verifies against the archive, which > we have wanted to be able to do for so many years! It really is great! thanks! > The older tests.reproducible-builds.org serves other purposes > (e.g. testing toolchain regressions and several important variations > such as systematic time variation) and still needs some attention now > and again! indeed. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ If you're not angry, you haven't been paying attention.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
