Hi, On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Build ID differs because the content of the binary > on which it has been calculated differs . It's only random if there is > randomness in the content.
ah! > Just writing “randomness_in_gnu_build_id” is equivalent to “something is > different” between the compiled binaries. Not a good categorization. Yes, but https://reproducible.debian.net/dbd/encfs_1.7.4-5.debbindiff.html doesn't show any other difference, same for bacula. So is this a bug / missing feature in debbindiff? Maybe the issue title is not helpful, but to me it still seems like a trackworthy category even or maybe especially as we dont know yet what it is... So maybe rename randomness_in_gnu_build_id to undefined_randomness_in_binary? or ..._elf_binary? cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds