control: retitle -1 "confusing warnings about allocations of rather small 
blocks of memory"
control: severity -1 minor

Hi,

On Samstag, 28. März 2015, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Sat Mar 28 05:46:22 UTC 2015 - debbindiff 12 will be used to compare the
> two builds now.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 233472):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 233472):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 512000):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 196608):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 512000):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 196608):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 1048576):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 516096):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 516096):
>       May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
> E: Caught signal ‘Terminated’: terminating immediately
> E: Caught signal ‘Terminated’

actually debbindiff was killed after running for 15min, that's why it was 
terminated.


cheers,
        Holger


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to