On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > while you thankfully added links to unreproducible packages on > reproducible.debian.net you've also added links to packages which fail to > build from source there, as can for example be seen on > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ocaml-faad
This was there since the first edition of the patch. > (eg half of the 700 ftbfs errors in unstable come from > https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/timestamps_from_cpp_macros_issue.html These seem like FTBFS that should be reported, so the package maintainers patch out usage of the macros, especially as the plan was to enable warnings for them by default eventually. > and there are more, like those caused by #677666 or #780587 or others. These indeed don't need to be reported. How can we show FTBFS that do need to be reported but not show FTBFS that don't need to be reported? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds