Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes:
> A downside of this is that POD_MAN_DATE will affect all the manual pages
> generated by Pod::Man and remove the potentially useful indications of
> their recency. I can't really see how to avoid that, but possibly we
> should set POD_MAN_DATE to something that isn't really a timestamp at
> all, so as not to mislead readers. Given the check for a true value in
> devise_date(), an empty string isn't an option, but a space or 'N/A'
> come to mind.
Oh, ugh, I'm sorry. Both of the relevant truth checks should just be
defined(); that's a bug. It's entirely valid to want to omit that heading
entirely, and --date '' or POD_MAN_DATE='' should do the right thing. (As
should --date 0, for that matter.) I'll fix that in the next upstream
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reproducible-builds mailing list