On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
> On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
>> The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent
>> timestamp.
>> The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the
>> documentation.
> while this works, javadoc should really be taught not to include those 
> timestamps by default, so that individual packages don't have to be fixed.

I totally agree. :-)
While looking at this issue I saw that javahelper passes -notimestamp to javadoc
by default now. I don't think there are that many packages calling javadoc 
But of course the best would be if javadoc changes its default behavior.

> That said, according to 
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc
> strip-nondeterminism should work around the issue too, anyone got an idea why 
> this doesnt happen?

jodconverter uses neither dh, nor cdbs, so strip-nondeterminism is not called.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to