On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote: >> The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent >> timestamp. >> >> The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the >> documentation. > > while this works, javadoc should really be taught not to include those > timestamps by default, so that individual packages don't have to be fixed.
I totally agree. :-) While looking at this issue I saw that javahelper passes -notimestamp to javadoc by default now. I don't think there are that many packages calling javadoc directly. But of course the best would be if javadoc changes its default behavior. > > That said, according to > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc > > strip-nondeterminism should work around the issue too, anyone got an idea why > this doesnt happen? jodconverter uses neither dh, nor cdbs, so strip-nondeterminism is not called. Regards, Reiner
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds