Mattia Rizzolo: > [removing the bug from the recipients list...] > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de> wrote: > > On 05/01/2015 11:30 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> That said, according to > >> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc > >> strip-nondeterminism should work around the issue too, anyone got an idea > >> why > >> this doesnt happen? > > > > jodconverter uses neither dh, nor cdbs, so strip-nondeterminism is not > > called. > > you said you think not many packages call javadoc directly, and > javahelper now passes -notimestamps. Do we know how many affected > packages strip-nondeterminism fixes? maybe is the case to remove that > code from strip-nondeterminism and fix the remaining packages?
I don't think that's a good idea. We do want strip-nondeterminism to benefit as many projects as possible and not only Debian. But we should make sure that running strip-nondeterminism on files that are already correct is a no-op. -- Lunar .''`. lu...@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds