Hi, Am Montag, den 25.05.2015, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > > Why does it build ghc-dbgsym at all? I do not define that in > > debian/rules. And > > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain does > > not mention a change in that direction either. > > We use the patched version of debhelper that builds .ddeb packages. That for > either test debhelper at generating them and (TTBMK) helped understanding some > differences (given that it contains some informations that would have been > stripped otherwise).
thanks. > > Also, is there any way to find out for what binary this debug file is? > > Or would it be visible if readelf would not fail on these files? > > you can use the build-id. > The differences in that file comes from > ./usr/lib/ghc/unix_G4Yo1pNtYrk8nCq1cx8P9d/libHSunix-184.108.40.206-G4Yo1pNtYrk8nCq1cx8P9d-ghc7.10.1.so it seems that the GHC build builds some auxiliary binaries (e.g. unlit, hp2hs) with the bootstrapping compiler, so for a chance of a fully reproducible build, the ghc package used needs to be fixed as well. That should be the case with ghc-7.8.4-7, uploaded to unstable today. It does not explain the differences in build-id of the the various lib...so files. Maybe the path name of the temporary file is taken into account as well. But shouldn’t that show up in the ghc-dbgsym package? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds