On Fri 2015-06-05 10:55:34 -0400, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Any of UTC_SOURCE_DATE, SOURCE_DATE_UTC
My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible (i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that people relying on it know they're getting a fixed thing, and don't have to implement any fancy parsing/offsetting code if they're not already using an ISO8601-compliant date-parsing library. > REPRODUCABLE_BUILD_SOURCE_DATE_UTC would work for me I don't like this one, because apparently it's too hard to spell :) --dkg _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
