Le samedi 4 juillet 2015, 17:30:47 Holger Levsen a écrit :
> > I think that Mattia's guess was closer:
> > >> Quite some FTBFS on our infrastructure are do to us using
> > >> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=23 (e.g. very high) and some packages not
> > >> coping fine with it.
> 
> interestingly he also tested building with -j4 and that didnt fail... :)

I guess this was linked to the load... I triggered it once
& mostly succeeded to heat the room even more.


Thank you very much for noticing this bug and for the hints,
when I filled it I felt it was like tossing a bottle in the sea.

Now, this src:cruft package is on end-of-life care;
I don't know what trigger the reproducible rebuilds,
but some FTFBS in the future are still possible as long
as there is no need to upload a new version of src:cruft;
please ignore these further FTBFS.


I've written my own proposal to get the whole cruft-handling fixed [1],
but that's not really a new idea either[2][3];
never had the time yet to dig in dpkg's code.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Cruft/purge
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/05/msg01346.html
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/02/msg01928.html


Alexandre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to