Hi,

not replying to the bug on purpose...

On Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2015, Dhole wrote:
> We have a proposal for using a deterministic timestamp [2] (based on
> the latest debian/changelog entry) which is contained in the environment
> variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH (currently exported by debhelper in our
> experimental framework).

If I would read this as a maintainer, I would probably think "this should at 
least wait til its used by debhelper in unstable"... also I'd be curious about 
the bug number for this feature in debhelper.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to