not replying to the bug on purpose...

On Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2015, Dhole wrote:
> We have a proposal for using a deterministic timestamp [2] (based on
> the latest debian/changelog entry) which is contained in the environment
> variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH (currently exported by debhelper in our
> experimental framework).

If I would read this as a maintainer, I would probably think "this should at 
least wait til its used by debhelper in unstable"... also I'd be curious about 
the bug number for this feature in debhelper.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to