On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm >> > very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can >> > always decide to remove or move them later. >> >> I wish to make all contributions upstream. What would really help at >> first would be to have all targets built regularly to see where work is >> needed. This is where I think the Debian infrastructure could help, in a >> similar way as what was started for Coreboot.
FWIW, I was planning on including this patch to u-boot in the next upload to Debian: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/u-boot.git/tree/debian/patches/use-date-from-debian-changelog.patch?h=experimental-2015.07 I *think* that actually makes u-boot build reproducibly with Debian's reproducible builds toolchain when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set, but I haven't tested it fully. I might have missed some other sources of non-determinism... Hoping to get some armhf buildd nodes up an running soonish... although it should also be buildable with the cross-toolchains, if the reproducible buildds coulld be made to support that. live well, vagrant
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds