Hey, thanks for the report.

Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of these 
patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for the 
difference? Consistency is a good principle in large-scale engineering. It is 
perhaps not worth it to change the existing patches now, but could future 
patches use the latter? I did point this out a few weeks ago in the previous 
report too.

At some point I also intend to experiment with adding this variable to 
/usr/share/dpkg/, which package maintainers could be encouraged to use, then 
one could experiment with 'include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk' instead of 
defining BUILD_DATE/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specifically. With the latter, package 
maintainers who aren't paying attention to wider developments in Debian, might 
be tempted to change that in the future.

X

On 20/07/15 18:02, Maria Valentina Marin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected
> by not_using_dh_builddeb [1].
> 
> Patches were submitted for the following packages:
> 
> - Package: abook
> https://bugs.debian.org/792995
> 
> - Package: angband
> https://bugs.debian.org/792994
> 
> - Package: argus-client
> https://bugs.debian.org/792943
> 
> - Package: authbind
> https://bugs.debian.org/792945
> 
> - Package: bcron
> https://bugs.debian.org/792996
> 
> - Package: beav
> https://bugs.debian.org/793000
> 
> - Package: blosxom
> https://bugs.debian.org/793001
> 
> - Package: ccze
> https://bugs.debian.org/792949
> 
> - Package: cgilib
> https://bugs.debian.org/793002
> 
> - Package: cgoban
> https://bugs.debian.org/792993
> 
> - Package: checkpw
> https://bugs.debian.org/793005
> 
> - Package: chiark-utils
> https://bugs.debian.org/792998
> 
> - Package: chimera2
> https://bugs.debian.org/792949
> 
> - Package: console-cyrillic
> https://bugs.debian.org/792999
> 
> - Package: cvs-mailcommit
> https://bugs.debian.org/792947
> 
> - Package: daemontools
> https://bugs.debian.org/793003
> 
> - Package: dbview
> https://bugs.debian.org/792951
> 
> - Package: debdelta
> https://bugs.debian.org/793004
> 
> - Package: dhcpdump
> https://bugs.debian.org/792951
> 
> - Package: dhcping
> https://bugs.debian.org/792953
> 
> - Package: dpatch
> https://bugs.debian.org/792954
> 
> - Package: dput
> https://bugs.debian.org/792955
> 
> - Package: dropbear
> https://bugs.debian.org/793006
> 
> - Package: dtaus
> https://bugs.debian.org/792958
> 
> - Package: elida
> https://bugs.debian.org/792959
> 
> - Package: enemies-of-carlotta
> https://bugs.debian.org/792961
> 
> - Package: erc
> https://bugs.debian.org/792963
> 
> - Package: fast-foward
> https://bugs.debian.org/792965
> 
> - Package: fgetty
> https://bugs.debian.org/792967
> 
> - Package: flowscan
> https://bugs.debian.org/792969
> 
> - Package: fortunes-bg
> https://bugs.debian.org/792970
> 
> - Package: freecdb
> https://bugs.debian.org/792989
> 
> - Package: ftpcopy
> https://bugs.debian.org/792982
> 
> - Package: gerstensaft
> https://bugs.debian.org/792983
> 
> - Package: gpsmanshp
> https://bugs.debian.org/792991
> 
> - Package: integrit
> https://bugs.debian.org/792984
> 
> - Package: ipsvd
> https://bugs.debian.org/792985
> 
> - Package: jargon
> https://bugs.debian.org/792987
> 
> - Package: junior-doc
> https://bugs.debian.org/792971
> 
> - Package: libjama
> https://bugs.debian.org/792972
> 
> - Package: liblip
> https://bugs.debian.org/792973
> 
> - Package: liblockfile
> https://bugs.debian.org/792974
> 
> - Package: libmsv
> https://bugs.debian.org/792975
> 
> - Package: logapp
> https://bugs.debian.org/792976
> 
> - Package: luakit
> https://bugs.debian.org/792977
> 
> - Package: nec
> https://bugs.debian.org/792978
> 
> - Package: runit
> https://bugs.debian.org/792979
> 
> - Package: skalibs
> https://bugs.debian.org/792990
> 
> - Package: tworld
> https://bugs.debian.org/792980
> 
> - Package: uruk
> https://bugs.debian.org/792986
> 
> - Package: wmweather
> https://bugs.debian.org/792981
> 
> - Package: xbs
> https://bugs.debian.org/792988
> 
> Kind Regards,
> akira
> 
> [1]
> https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Reproducible-builds mailing list
> Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
> 


-- 
GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to