On 21/07/15 14:33, Maria Valentina Marin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of 
>> these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for 
>> the difference? 
> 
> I used this fix because it was specified in the description here
> https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html
> 
> 
>> but could future patches use the latter? 
> 
> I can use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for future patches, and also modify the
> issue description.
> 
> Will this be okay for everybody?
> 

Sounds good to me; note that you have to change the commands to prepend a '@' 
in front of the variable, like:

find -newermt '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)'
touch --date '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)'

X

-- 
GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to