On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:56:32PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Clint, > > On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, Clint Adams wrote: > > I suggest comparing builds with and without the Recommends of the > > Build-Depends installed. > > I think thats out of scope for our project currently: buildds don't install > recommends, so we also don't install them.
I agree. We already vary a lot of stuff between builds, and soon we'll vary even more (the date). For what I'm concerned we should defer more variation once more patches land in the archive > It's probably still worthwhile testing this, but IMO probably rather as a one > time whole archive rebuild. If the point is finding out whether the package FTBFS or not I suggest looking at https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting (even if the results are presented in a less shiny format than ours) > "btw", where are these fields defined? I couldn't find Build-Recommends: in > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html ? I believe he means with APT::Install-Recommends=true and false on the host. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds