On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:08:03PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> wrote: > > Le jeudi 13 août 2015 à 18:08 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit : > >> Along with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to recreate a > >> build with a specific date timestamp. This allows the verification of > >> source supplied with a pre-compiled binary. > >> > >> If SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is supplied SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to specify > >> what will appear in the output of the version command. If SOURCE_DATE_TZ > >> is not specified UTC will be used. SOURCE_DATE_TZ on it's own will not > >> have an affect. > > > > I advise against merging this patch given Ximin Luo's comments on v1, at > > least until this has been properly discussed with the reproducible team > > and a precise meaning for it has been agreed on. > > > > I'm happy to go along with that. 1/2 of this series was the "fix". 2/2 > just kind of came up as part of the discussion that followed. Tom, can > you handle that or do you want me to send a v4 of the series with just > the first patch?
I'll pick up just the first patch for now, shortly. -- Tom
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds