On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:08:03PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> wrote:
> > Le jeudi 13 août 2015 à 18:08 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit :
> >> Along with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to recreate a
> >> build with a specific date timestamp. This allows the verification of
> >> source supplied with a pre-compiled binary.
> >>
> >> If SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is supplied SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to specify
> >> what will appear in the output of the version command. If SOURCE_DATE_TZ
> >> is not specified UTC will be used.  SOURCE_DATE_TZ on it's own will not
> >> have an affect.
> >
> > I advise against merging this patch given Ximin Luo's comments on v1, at
> > least until this has been properly discussed with the reproducible team
> > and a precise meaning for it has been agreed on.
> >
> I'm happy to go along with that. 1/2 of this series was the "fix". 2/2
> just kind of came up as part of the discussion that followed. Tom, can
> you handle that or do you want me to send a v4 of the series with just
> the first patch?

I'll pick up just the first patch for now, shortly.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to