Hi, On Freitag, 11. September 2015, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Just one little thing: there is no tag "1.0". > Whoops. Pushed.
Thanks. > > Should we start a 1.1 branch now? > If you think that would be useful, sure; it would provide a place for > non-trivial changes to go. I guess taht can wait for actual commits, but I think it's good we agreed on this road now. > If it helps, I'm pretending that all cosmetic/typo changes since 1.0 > were actually part of 1.0. Whilst a bit naughty, it does mean that the > version we publish on the web a) has these corrections, and b) is an > actual released version, rather than being labelled as "pre-release" > which would not encourage adoption (the entire point of the spec to > begin with). or we could just release them as 1.0.1, 1.0.2, ...? But then, I also think that's too much for pure typo fixes. OTOH, this would be where an 1.0 branch would come handy... (I'm now also thinking about tje job building + publishing the spec...) cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds