On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +0000, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:13:09AM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > > The left column of reproducible status for gcin  displays gcin > > version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail > > result, the version annotated is actual 2.8.2+dfsg1-1. > > > >  https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/gcin.html > > This is normal and expected (to some degree) because notes are updated > by hand (the version you see there is like the "Version" field in > the Debian BTS). > > In this case, the note was wrong because it said the package had an issue > which is now fixed. I've just removed the note to fix that.
Thank for the help. > Now the package is in "uncategorized state", which means it fails to > build reproducibly but we don't know the exact reason, so it will need > to be investigated. > > If you have some idea why this package does not build reproducibly, > we can write a new note for it. > > (Or you could also join us and write the note yourself :-). I will investigate it, but how can I join the team and update the note? > > Thanks. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@gmail.com> http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds