On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:36:58PM +0000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:13:09AM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> > The left column of reproducible status for gcin [0] displays gcin
> > version as 2.8.3+dfsg1-6. However, if we clikc the link for detail
> > result, the version annotated is actual 2.8.2+dfsg1-1.
> > 
> > [0] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/testing/amd64/gcin.html
> This is normal and expected (to some degree) because notes are updated
> by hand (the version you see there is like the "Version" field in
> the Debian BTS).
> In this case, the note was wrong because it said the package had an issue
> which is now fixed. I've just removed the note to fix that.

Thank for the help.

> Now the package is in "uncategorized state", which means it fails to
> build reproducibly but we don't know the exact reason, so it will need
> to be investigated.
> If you have some idea why this package does not build reproducibly,
> we can write a new note for it.
> (Or you could also join us and write the note yourself :-).

I will investigate it, but how can I join the team and update the note?

> Thanks.

ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@gmail.com>
Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to