> > Of course, but that involves diverging from upstream.
> 
> Well, it depends.
> 
> My theory is that stop using the build date is what a sensible
> upstream would do, so we would not be diverging, just "anticipating",
> since we would move in the same direction.

I share your discomfort re. the dates, but many upstreams are dead
and/or don't care.

Do we really want to unnecessarily burden the maintainer with
maintaining this patch forever? By all means send the patch upstream,
but bear in mind the alternative in *this* case is adjusting
debian/rules, a file completely and entirely within our control.


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to