On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:12:18AM +0300, Esa Peuha wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> wrote:
> > For the same reason (not being build-essential), it is ok that it's
> > not pre-installed in pbuilder chroot, and in fact, usually it's not.
> Huh? How is the second build supposed to be able to set the locale to
> fr_CH without the locales package?
> > For example, it's not here:
> >
> > https://reproducible.debian.net/buildinfo/unstable/amd64/base-files_9.4_amd64.buildinfo
> A .buildinfo file doesn't (and isn't meant to) list all installed
> packages, only those that are actually needed for the build.
> > If you can verify that installing the locales package fixes the error,
> > then it would be clearly a "missing build-depends: locales" bug.
> No, that is not the problem. If you look at
> https://reproducible.debian.net/rbuild/unstable/amd64/apertium-en-ca_0.9.3~r61232-1.rbuild.log
> you can see that locales is in the Build-Depends list, but pbuilder
> doesn't try to install it, so either there is something wrong with

What's going on is the following: in our chroot locales-all is
preinstalled, and that package Provides:locales.  But locales-all does
not ship everything locales does.
This is #788352.

In the past we bugged maintainers to add a Build-Conflicts on
locales-all, but given that is allegedly fixed in experimental now I'd
tag packages affected by this, so to remove them from our list, and then
rebuild them once fixed glibc hit unstable.

                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to