Hi, Dhole, thanks for keeping up the good work on this! +kudos too! :)
On Dienstag, 10. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Out of interest, would you extend this argument to argue for an > > arbitrary build path? > In principle, yes. I have yet to see why an executable should be > different just because it was built in one path or in another one. While I agree in theory, I do disagree in practise and today. I totally agree keeping this on a todo list somewhere visible, but we also want reproducible builds now and using a fixed path is the only solution we found in a year of looking for it. So, I don't want perfect to be the blocker of very good (in the case of reproducible builds). cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds