On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:44:59PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Well, I still would like to push to add `-Wdate-time` to our default set > of CFLAGS. Even with Dhole's patch, developpers would see the warning > and ask themselves if it's the right thing to do.
Good that. We are now down to 2 packages which FTBFS with -Wdate-time https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/expeyes.html https://bugs.debian.org/790103 https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wsjt.html no bug filed https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/ftbfs_wdatetime_issue.html And other 2 packages (subversion and unbound) which fails due to swig https://bugs.debian.org/790102 https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/ftbfs_wdatetime_due_to_swig_issue.html This is what should be done to achive our goal: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#Q:_Can_we_add_support_for_new_default_build_flags_to_dpkg-buildflags.3F To me it seems only the d-d thread is missing, maybe after filing the missing bug against src:wsjt. If nobody object I can start that thread. dpkg bug with the first "timeless" feature: https://bugs.debian.org/762683 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds