On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote:

> Hi Francesco,

Hi Reiner,
thanks for your kind reply!

> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the
> > case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool?
[...]
> 
> Yes, you are right. This is something that should be fixed in rdtool,
> probably by adding support there for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [2].

OK, good, you were already aware of the issue.

Please do not hesitate to file a bug report against apt-listbugs, in
case there's anything I can change in apt-listbugs itself in order to
help.

Bye!


> [1]: 
> https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_rdtool_issue.html
> [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/
> 


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpzM9eZuemrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to