On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:08:44AM +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > FWIW, I'm not exactly entirely convinced by the exporting of the > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH variable from debian/rules; all other variables have > > been passed without exporting so I'm wondering if we shouldn't adapt > > this to behave like other variables, reducing possible surprise for > > users. > > Just to explain that -- if it's defined in the environment, it requires > no special handling and doesn't need to be (re-)exported. I think this > is maybe the case now for dpkg-buildpackage in sid?
it's not, dpkg hasn't merged that patch (tbh I'm not even sure we forwarded that). Though debhelper exports SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when using the dh sequencer. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds