Guillem Jover:
> > How about naming the field “Environment-Variables”?
> Hmm, or Environment, or Build-Environment, which reminds me that I've
> found the usage of Build-Environment (as the list of transitively
> required packages) slightly confusing, precisely because the first
> thing that comes to mind with environment is the variable space.
> Perhaps we should consider renaming that one? Say Build-Packages (but
> that might be confusing), Build-Depends-Used, or something else? We
> also already have a Built-Using field too (although for source
> packages not binary ones, with a name I've also found slightly
> confusing as being too generic).

Ok. What about “Environment” for the variables, and
“Installed-Build-Depends” for the list of packages?

Lunar                                .''`.                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to