Guillem Jover: > > How about naming the field “Environment-Variables”? > > Hmm, or Environment, or Build-Environment, which reminds me that I've > found the usage of Build-Environment (as the list of transitively > required packages) slightly confusing, precisely because the first > thing that comes to mind with environment is the variable space. > > Perhaps we should consider renaming that one? Say Build-Packages (but > that might be confusing), Build-Depends-Used, or something else? We > also already have a Built-Using field too (although for source > packages not binary ones, with a name I've also found slightly > confusing as being too generic).
Ok. What about “Environment” for the variables, and “Installed-Build-Depends” for the list of packages? -- Lunar .''`. lu...@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds