Source: ruby-solve
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

ruby-solve fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

  [..]

  Pending: (Failures listed here are expected and do not affect your suite's 
status)
  
    1) Solve::GecodeSolver finding unsatisfiable demands partitions demands 
into satisfiable and not satisfiable
       # Not yet implemented
       # ./spec/unit/solve/gecode_solver_spec.rb:183
  
    2) Solve ClassMethods #it returns nil if a solution does not exist
       # No reason given
       # ./spec/unit/solve_spec.rb:8
  
    3) Solve ClassMethods #it! raises NoSolutionError if a solution does not 
exist
       # No reason given
       # ./spec/unit/solve_spec.rb:14
  
  Failures:
  
    1) Solutions when using the ruby solver raises NoSolutionError when a 
solution cannot be found
       Failure/Error: lambda {
         expected Solve::Errors::NoSolutionError, got #<NoMethodError: 
undefined method `allow_missing?' for #<Solve::RubySolver:0x00000001df6f00>> 
with backtrace:
           # ./lib/solve/ruby_solver.rb:177:in `resolve_with_error_wrapping'
           # ./lib/solve/ruby_solver.rb:72:in `resolve'
           # ./lib/solve.rb:64:in `it!'
           # ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:36:in `block (3 
levels) in <top (required)>'
           # ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:35:in `block (2 
levels) in <top (required)>'
       # ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:35:in `block (2 
levels) in <top (required)>'
  
    2) Solutions when using the ruby solver tries all combinations until it 
finds a solution
       Failure/Error: result = Solve.it!(graph, demands)
       NoMethodError:
         undefined method `allow_missing?' for 
#<Solve::RubySolver:0x00000001f7b448>
       # ./lib/solve/ruby_solver.rb:177:in `resolve_with_error_wrapping'
       # ./lib/solve/ruby_solver.rb:72:in `resolve'
       # ./lib/solve.rb:64:in `it!'
       # ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:201:in `block (2 
levels) in <top (required)>'
  
    3) Solve::RubySolver when the constraints are not solvable and molinillo 
identifies constraints that exclude all known versions raises an error 
detailing the missing artifacts
       Failure/Error: expect(error).to 
be_a_kind_of(Solve::Errors::NoSolutionError)
         expected #<NoMethodError: undefined method `allow_missing?' for 
#<Solve::RubySolver:0x00000001cbaa38>> to be a kind of 
Solve::Errors::NoSolutionError
       # ./spec/unit/solve/ruby_solver_spec.rb:110:in `block (4 levels) in <top 
(required)>'
  
    4) Solve::RubySolver when the constraints are not solvable and molinillo 
identifies missing artifacts raises an error detailing the missing artifacts
       Failure/Error: expect(error).to 
be_a_kind_of(Solve::Errors::NoSolutionError)
         expected #<NoMethodError: undefined method `allow_missing?' for 
#<Solve::RubySolver:0x00000001c5dcc0>> to be a kind of 
Solve::Errors::NoSolutionError
       # ./spec/unit/solve/ruby_solver_spec.rb:90:in `block (4 levels) in <top 
(required)>'
  
  Deprecation Warnings:
  
  RSpec::Core::Configuration#treat_symbols_as_metadata_keys_with_true_values= 
is deprecated, it is now set to true as default and setting it to false has no 
effect.
  
  Using `should` from rspec-expectations' old `:should` syntax without 
explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or 
explicitly enable `:should` with `config.expect_with(:rspec) { |c| c.syntax = 
:should }` instead. Called from 
/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160301070242.8rIosWHgd4/ruby-solve-2.0.1/spec/unit/solve/gecode_solver_spec.rb:68:in
 `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'.
  
  Using `stub` from rspec-mocks' old `:should` syntax without explicitly 
enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or explicitly 
enable `:should` instead. Called from 
/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160301070242.8rIosWHgd4/ruby-solve-2.0.1/spec/unit/solve/gecode_solver_spec.rb:153:in
 `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'.
  
  
  If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
  identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
  `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
  deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
  
  3 deprecation warnings total
  
  Finished in 0.12653 seconds (files took 0.12439 seconds to load)
  105 examples, 4 failures, 3 pending
  
  Failed examples:
  
  rspec ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:31 # Solutions when 
using the ruby solver raises NoSolutionError when a solution cannot be found
  rspec ./spec/acceptance/ruby_solver_solutions_spec.rb:167 # Solutions when 
using the ruby solver tries all combinations until it finds a solution
  rspec ./spec/unit/solve/ruby_solver_spec.rb:109 # Solve::RubySolver when the 
constraints are not solvable and molinillo identifies constraints that exclude 
all known versions raises an error detailing the missing artifacts
  rspec ./spec/unit/solve/ruby_solver_spec.rb:89 # Solve::RubySolver when the 
constraints are not solvable and molinillo identifies missing artifacts raises 
an error detailing the missing artifacts
  
  Randomized with seed 54553
  
  /usr/bin/ruby2.2 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb failed
  ERROR: Test "ruby2.2" failed. Exiting.
  dh_auto_install: dh_ruby --install 
/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20160301070242.8rIosWHgd4/ruby-solve-2.0.1/debian/ruby-solve
 returned exit code 1
  debian/rules:18: recipe for target 'binary' failed
  make: *** [binary] Error 1

  [..]

The full build log is attached.


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Attachment: ruby-solve.2.0.1-2.unstable.amd64.log.txt.gz
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Reply via email to