On Montag, 7. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Sure, but I suspect there are *some* builds that will never succeed in
> under 12 hours with a single CPU core (on the current armhf build
> hardware, anyways).

I doubt there are many of those, who will manage with dual-cores in 12h, 
especially if there are other builds going on at the same time.

> Overall I like the proposal to stop varying number of CPUs for armhf.
> There's some variation with number of cores simply due to having
> dual-core, quad-core and (recently) octa-core systems.  That also means
> we have no builds running with only CPUs=1, which I think is a good
> thing overall.

I've implemented and documented this in the variation table now.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to