On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:10:53PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Only from me asking:
>  | So, just to be 100% clear, simply varying DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=X"
>  | would not have discovered this gedit bug? 
> Where — in context — varying meant 17 vs. 18 instead of 1 vs. 18.

it wasn't clear to me that the resulting gedit package would be
reproducible. in fact, gedit with non parallel build currently still
aint reproducible on i386+armhf, maybe thats why.
> (Besides, we've seen enough strange packages to think that anything is
> possible…)

right. "so rare that's it's hardly worth testing and adding complexity…"


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to