On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:10:53PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Only from me asking: > | So, just to be 100% clear, simply varying DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=X" > | would not have discovered this gedit bug? > Where — in context — varying meant 17 vs. 18 instead of 1 vs. 18.
it wasn't clear to me that the resulting gedit package would be reproducible. in fact, gedit with non parallel build currently still aint reproducible on i386+armhf, maybe thats why. > (Besides, we've seen enough strange packages to think that anything is > possible…) right. "so rare that's it's hardly worth testing and adding complexity…" -- cheers, Holger
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds