On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:44:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: > I do think it's OK to try to support diffoscope 67 for 2 years because it's > been quite well tested.
well, yes… but…
> I understand that 77 fixes quite a lot of bugs over 67…
77 *exists* and is quite probably a lot better than 67, so I now think we
should strive for 77 (or 77++ if needed) in stretch… I like 77, I just don't
like the way we got there. But now that we have it, no need to hide it.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
