Hi Rob,
> Or rather, if Clojure's only looking at the timestamps in the jar file,
> then those may have a known (fixed) resolution, and so we'd just need to
> make sure that the .clj files are at least that much older than the
> corresponding .class files inside the jar.
Right; that's:
> > b) We make strip-nondetermism subtract 1 second from the .clj files'
> > target modification times so it matches with the existing ">".
.. is it not? :)
> Though I'd probably still pick 1s or more just so that an unpacked jar
> will still have the right timestamp ordering on the vast majority of
> filesystems.
I don't quite get what you mean I'm afraid. Filesystem ordering (at least
via readdir/listdir, etc.) is non-deterministic. Can you explain it to me
another way? I'd also be curious to know why you think *more* than one
second could ever be needed here. I think I'm mising something.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
