On 16/10/17 17:23, Chris Lamb wrote: > Jathan, > >> Thank you for teaching me to think more technically and to learn from >> what has emerged > > No problem! I thought it best to not "spoonfeed" you the answers! > >> I can safely say to Emmanuel Bourg that tar timestamps are not >> yet normalized by strip-nondeterminism > > Indeed. > > By the way, you say "yet" -- one idea behind strip-nondeterminism is that > it will, one day, go away. That means we actually avoid adding features > wherever possible, so we probably *won't* add support for tar archives. :) > > > Best wishes, > Thanks Lamby! So it would be right to write some simple answer to Emmanuel like this at the bug?:
Hi Emmanuel, Tar timestamps are not normalized by strip-nondeterminism. Best regards. Jathan Is that enough? Regards! Jathan -- Por favor evita enviarme adjuntos en formato de word o powerpoint, si quieres saber porque lee esto: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html ¡Cámbiate a GNU/Linux! http://getgnulinux.org/es
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
