On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:01:54AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> John Sonnenschein wrote:
> >Sorry to butt in here, but I was under the impression that code should
> >never make reference to the bug it fixes. Am I mistaken here?
> Normally yes. However in this case, I think since the "workaround" may
> need some explanation, its not a bad idea to reference it.
The correct CR is:
6379193 ctfconvert needs to support VLA for gcc's DWARF
(which I just duped the new one to)