>Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
>> So, if I can have some codereviewers then I can putback this change to
>> build 110.
>The 'suggested fix' in CR 6807179 doesn't seem to match this fix -- it
>includes a new test for the getpwnam problem, plus some other changes
>to alias.c.  Is the webrev out of date or does the CR differ for some
>other reason?

Sorry, I may have responded to the wrong message asking for 

The proper webrev is:


>The webrev doesn't include the CR in the comments.  Have you done 'hg

The webrev was created by the contributor; he's not going to use my 
workspace to do the putback :-)


Reply via email to